43: Inherent Nature of Pollution or Beyond Dogma

Reality Turned Inside Out

We briefly mentioned the situation when F > T in which case we switched our notation from the fat or polluted truth, t, to the fat or polluted falsehood, f, because it has a larger component of False than True.

What are the implications?

Notation: the lower case represents the polluted, while the upper case represents the pure. So while the polluted are a function of the pure, the pure are not a function of the polluted.

t = f(T,F) = f

T ≠ f(t,f) ≠ F

At this point the Real is taken for the Imaginary and vice versa.

This is represented graphically by the shifted quadrants. in which the probabilities occur. Instead of the first quadrant with a greater possibility of True behavior, i.e. compassionate and conscious awareness, uncorrupted by attachment, the Human is trapped in the second quadrant with a greater possibility of vengeful or emotional reaction to circumstances, corrupted by attachment to expectations.

In the first quadrant there is generally a motion towards the Light, + , and away from the Dark, – . In the second quadrant, represented in the diagram, the tendency is to move towards the Dark.

Reflection : In brief the Light is Life Giving, just like the original solar energy to the first single celled amoeba - while the Dark is Death bringing.

Examples of Music and Exercise

As an example: If we base our system of truth upon the underlying assumption that Playing Music is good, M = T, and not Playing Music is bad, ~M = F, then perhaps friends, TV, and schoolwork might be considered vectors towards the Dark, while teachers, parents, and self satisfaction might be considered vectors towards the Light. If there are more vectors (or little arrows, as Feynman calls them) towards Light than Dark, then the Human continues playing Music. If there are more little arrows towards the Dark, the Person quits playing Music.

Music is just one activity that comes to mind. We could also include Exercise. The Light giving Vectors would be Personal Health, Group Dynamics and even Vanity. While the Dark pointing arrows would be lack of energy, TV, bad diet, and group dynamics.

Again if more of the Light pointing arrows are firing, then the Person continues exercising. If the Dark pointing vector arrows fire more frequently, then the Human’s Exercise might cease altogether.

The System that seems to be emerging is based upon the theory behind Q.E.D.

All explication based upon Metaphor

Reflection: Again we must stress that these equations, quadrants, vector-arrows, charts and the like are only metaphorical in nature - as is all meaning derived from words. The truth behind the metaphor is my Being, my Direct Perception of Reality. Because of the complicated, non-verbal nature of the Vision, we are bringing up anything that might clarify rather than obscure. However, because of the inherent nature of words, they obscure Reality. Hence there exists a constant tendency to impart Reality to the word constructs. We must constantly guard against this tendency.

Differentiation between Reality and our Mathematics

In order to neutralize this tendency, before it gets out of hand, let us examine or differentiate between Reality and our Mathematics, which is illustrating Reality.

First, there exist no precise experiments that can be done to test results. Second, there exists no precise quantification of variables. Finally, any Data that could be generated to run any experiment would be hopelessly fuzzy with hopelessly fuzzy criterion.

Hoping to trigger Transformation

Reader: “Then what is hoped for in determining a mathematics that models the concepts, if one can’t test them with the scientific method?”

Applying the T/F Postulate: the false behind the scientific symbols is the possibility of applying the scientific method. The truth is vectors pointing towards the White Light.

In employing the mathematical notation, we are attempting - however futilely - tragically - fractally missing - to strive for another dimension - achieve a higher order - to communicate some difficult concepts more precisely, without connotation. Of course this is impossible. But adopting the archetype of the Tragic Hero, we must try - and just maybe if we’re lucky - someone just might go faster than the speed of light, proceed backwards in time, to have occurred before they happened - The Future is Now.

Perhaps some Human might achieve Transformation - their Firing will be successful - because these Signposts called words and diagrams might inspire an investigation into the true nature of Being.

Truth and Falsehood unattached to Dogma

In these sections we attempt to talk in broad concepts about Truth and Falsehood, T&F, unattached to concept. We can talk about the nature of T&F without dogma attached to it. That can enter later or be determined personally after intense investigation.

For instance, the words Truth and Falsehood might be understood clearly - but their implications not. We can write an equation, t = T - iF, which says the Polluted truth contains the real Truth polluted by the imaginary world of Falsehood. In many ways this is a definitional equation, i.e. indisputable.

Thus the definitional equation is understandable by anyone. No one would disagree - No matter what nationality race or creed - deist or atheist - materialist or naturalist. While everyone would agree that polluted truth is truth polluted by falsehood - perhaps the Little White Lie - each Person, by definition of uniqueness, would have a different version of what truth and falsehood are.

Aside: one assumption that is already being pushed concerning T&F is that it has much less to do with verbal concepts and more to do with probability of motion towards the Light and Dark, Vitality and Oblivion, to Life and Death, to the Now vs. Time.

Beyond Dogma to the Inherent Nature of True and False

Many might apply these notions about T&F to verbal dogma. However, we are attempting to shift the notion of truth to a probabilistic behavioral model rather, than a ‘precise’ verbal model, which is mythical at best. We’re attempting, perhaps somewhat futilely, to shift our attentions from deductive bickering about details to an attempt at understanding a more holistic view of Reality i.e. the logical systems incorporated by the Metalogical or Intuitive System - the Consistent Systems included in the Complete System.

The Discovery of the Pollution Equation - beyond Deduction

We discovered the equation for polluted truth, t = T - iF, but not through deductive reasoning. We had been looking for a long time for an equation - for this equation - sensing - glimpsing - not finding - losing - forgetting - remembering - and then came a period of Deep Writing - and then once again a period of Scientific Discovery - when mathematical symbols emerged again.

Note that this state, these states, is uncalled for - unbidden. Instead they are sensed - weeded and magnified - cultivated, watered and fertilized - growing like a weed - pruned back and examined - and then growth and more pruning - and then finally after months of mindless, sense filled wandering - not knowing quite where - inadequate as the Mind is to figure these things out - i.e. the future Directions - and then we stumbled upon this marvelous equation - which, thru its implications, contains so much of Life’s Mystery at the Core of Being.

The external, attempting to mimic the internal, had a cataract surgery scheduled for my Human the Day after the Equation Discovery. My Person could see completely once again internally and externally - fairly corny but effective symbolism - a positive Omen - the proactive Universe agrees and ratifies.

Proactive, Reactive, Neutral Universe

      All Three -

But in this case

                  And in most

                              The Universe is Proactive

                                          To Me.

First the Internal Resonance, then Deductive Logic takes over

Anyway, the equation was sensed, not deduced.

    The excitement of discovery was based on the exact isomorphism

        Between the mathematical system and the Experiential Reality.

    But the Insight was not based in Logic.

The Resonance was heard and sensed on Deep Levels.

    There was a ringing, clanging in my Soul that was clamoring to come out.

        Only then did the Logical systems come into play -

    Organizing, sifting and differentiating.

But then after Logic had joined the Research project -

    Designed to determine true from false isomorphic correspondences -

        Which required a good amount of Reason -

    The Logical Brain took over the Project -

        Attempting to turn the symbolic system into a scientifically consistent Reality.

Today has been an attempt to put the Left Brain in his proper place as an analyst,

    Not the Leader of the project.

        Down Boy.

Thus to regularly practice self-reflection is important.

    As this practice keeps us steadily on track,

        Rather than drifting off on side paths.

            Which ‘don’t’ turn out to be the real path at all.

Roughly Defining Components of Behavior Probability

On this topic, let us examine our graph again.

Our original equation represented amplitudes of Behavior - perhaps Data Stream Momentum - while the squared equation represented the Probabilities of Behavior. Thus the variables of our pollution equation represent amplitudes. Squaring this expression according to the polarity-based definitions of the past chapters yields probabilities of behavior based upon the amplitude of the behavior waves.

t = T - iF

P(t) = t2 = (T - iF) * (T- iF)

      = T2 - iFT + TiF - F2 = (f2 when F>T) = P(f)

According to our intuitions, we will define what each component of the above equation means.

t2 =P(t) = Pt = the probability of a relatively true behavior with a corrupted motivation.

      Example: Helping out only for reward.

T2 = P(T) = PT = the probability of true behavior with true motivation

      Example: Helping out as a contribution to the common good
                        with no thought of reward.

F2 = P(F) = PF = the probability of false behavior because of corrupted motivation

      Example: Not helping out to take advantage for Personal Gain.

iFT = P(iF) = PiF = the probability of veering from the true course

                  because of corrupted motivation

      Example: start helping out for good and end out helping out for personal gain.

TiF = P(iT) = PiT = the probability of reversing course back to the true.

      Example: Helping out for good of whole, corrupted by desire for personal Gain.

                  Perhaps integrity is disturbed- then remorse, because no peace of mind

                              Then remorse and back to helping for good.

      Let’s not forget

f2 = P(f) = PF = the probability of false behavior based upon true motivations

      Example: Helping out someone who doesn’t want any help.

With all those probabilities, and more, firing all the time - one can go on automatic and erratically follow impulse - or one can seize control with the Left Brain and limit possibilities - or one can damp and augment different waves thru Conscious Awareness.

That’s all for today folks.

Come back tomorrow - we hope to deal with Inverted Realities and Veering from the Course.

 

Home    The Firing Process    V. Differentiation    Previous    Next    Comments